W. Royall Cox, Ting Chen, Chi Guan, Donald J. Hayes and
Rick E. Hoenigman
MicroFab Technologies, Inc., 1104 Summit Ave., Suite
110, Plano, TX 75074
ph: (972) 578-8076 / fax: (972) 423-2438 :
Brian T. Teipen and Duncan L. MacFarlane
The University of Texas at Dallas, P.O. Box 830688, EC33,
Richardson, TX 75083
ph: (972) 883-2165 / fax: (972) 883-6839
1. Introduction
The technology for fabricating micro-optical elements for low cost
optical interconnects by micro-jet (ink-jet) printing has been under development
for over two years [1,2]. This data-driven method of micro-optics fabrication
offers the benefits of low cost, flexibility and in-situ, non-contact
processing. These features can be used to advantage in applications where
increasing the efficiency of optical power coupling as a value-added step
is a goal, and they provide unique capabilities for rapid prototyping and
customization of microlens arrays. Here we present our latest results in
developing this Optics-Jet technology for applications such as collimation
of the outputs of LEDs and diode lasers, as well as for increasing the
efficiency of focusing of GRIN lenses [3]. Data on printed microlens optical
characteristics will be shown, as well as their performance in collimation
and astigmatism reduction of optical sources.
Figure 1. Generation of 50µm droplets at 2 kHz.
2. Microlens Printing Method
In "drop-on-demand" microjet printing a single droplet is ejected from
the print head every time its piezoelectric actuator is pulsed, producing
droplets with precise volumetric control at rates up to 5 kHz, as illustrated
in the photograph of Figure 1. To fabricate a microlens by this method,
a print head with 30-60 µm orifice diameter is used to deposit at
165C similarly sized droplets of UV-curing optical material onto the target
site which is typically held at 40C. An example of microlenses formed in
this way is the array pictured in Figure 2 of 220 µm diameter lenslets
printed directly onto one end of a 5 mm diameter GRIN lens for reduction
of optical insertion loss. For a given optical material, device orifice
size and substrate, the diameter and focal length of a printed lenslet
are logarithmic functions of the number of deposited droplets, as seen
in the data of Figure 3. The speed of a printed microlens for a given mass
of deposited material is a function of the degree of spreading which occurs
on the substrate prior to solidification which, in turn, is controlled
by the viscosity level of the material and the degree to which it wets
the substrate surface. For polymeric optical materials deposited onto a
silanized glass substrate, microlens speed remains relatively constant
over a wide range of diameters.
Figure
2. 10x10 array of 220µm diameter micro-lenses printed onto
5mm GRIN lens.
3. Printed Microlens Optical Characteristics and Reproducibility
The optical imaging quality of printed hemispherical microlenses was
assessed by measuring the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). The measurement
system, which utilizes a virtual point source of 665 nm to illuminate the
convex surface of the lenslet under test and a 100x microscope objective
to project the focused light onto a CCD camera, is capable of measuring
microlenses with diameters in the 100 µm - 50 mm range. Measured
MTF data for a printed 110 µm diameter microlens with speed of f/1.25,
given in Figure 4 along with the those for an ideal (diffraction-limited)
lenslet of the same speed, show an identical cutoff spatial frequency (1,200
1p/mm). The Strehl Ratio, obtained from the ratio of integrated areas under
the measured and theoretical curves, is 0.71, indicating that the printed
microlens produces relatively little spherical aberration in this measurement
configuration. To determine the reproducibility of printing a microlens,
a microscope system is used to measure diameters and focal lengths of individual
microlenses within variously configured arrays. Focal length data for a
10 x 10 array of 495 µm diameter microlenses printed onto low-wet-coated
glass on 750 µm centers are given in Figure 5. The standard deviations
from the average values of focal length and diameter within such arrays
are on the order of 1.5% and 1%, respectively, which are within the measurement
errors and sufficient for many array optical interconnect applications.
Microlens placement accuracy depends primarily on the accuracy of the substrate
stages and the distance between print head orifice and substrate surface.
At a typical printing distance of 1 mm, our R&D system can place microlenses
with an accuracy 2 µm.
Figure
4. Modulation transfer function for an f/1.25 microlens printed with
one 50µm drop of UV-curing optical material (solid curve), compared
to ideal, diffraction-limited case (dashed curve) at same f/# (open file
for readable resolution).
Figure
5. Distribution of focal lengths of 100 each 0.5 µm diameter
microlenses printed in 10x10 array on 750 µm centers, showing a typical
standard deviation from the average value of 1.5% (open file for readable
resolution).Figure
6. Geometry for LED array collimation by printed microlenses (open
file for readable resolution).
Figure
7. Array of 355 µm diameter micro-lenses printed on 375 µm
centers, shown in substrate plane (top) and in profile (bottom).
These
hemi-elliptical microlenses are printed along the bar direction by depositing
a line of droplets of optical material , which join by cohesion prior to
curing, and adjusting the number and spacing of the droplets to control
lenslet size and ellipticity. An example of a series of microlenses of
differing degrees of ellipticity is given in Figure 8, where six 60 µm
droplets were printed at adjacent sites to form each lenslet, with increasing
site spacing for successive lenslets. The variations with deposition site
spacing of the major and minor axis lengths and corresponding "slow" and
"fast" focal lengths of the microlenses pictured in Figure 8 are plotted
in Figure 9. Increasing site spacing effectively increase the ratios of
both major/minor axes and slow/fast focal lengths, providing the capability
for tuning printed microlens properties for a wide range of diode laser
configurations.
In
practice, the degree of ellipticity required may be quite small, e.g.,
on the order of 1.001 to correct an astigmatism of 5 µm.
5.
Conclusions
References
[1] W.R. Cox, T. Chen, D.W. Ussery, D.J. Hayes, and,
R.F. Hoenigman, "Microjet printing of anamorphic microlens arrays," SPIE
Proceedings, Vol. 2687, pp.89-98, 1996.
[2] W.R. Cox, D.J. Hayes, T. Chen, H-J Trost, M.E. Grove, R.F. Hoenigman and D.L. MacFarlane, "Low cost optical interconnects by microjet printing," IMAPS International Journal of Microcircuits & Electronic Packaging, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.89-95, 1997.
[3] V. Baukens, A. Goulet, H. Thienpont, I. Veretennicoff, W.R. Cox and C. Guan, "GRIN-lens based optical interconnection systems for planes of micro-emitters and detectors: microlens arrays improve transmission efficiency," OSA Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics Topical Meeting, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, June, 1998.